Bhutan:The Era of Chaos
Zhabdrung realized that Bhutan needed to differentiate itself
from Tibet in order to promote its religion
and cultural identity. He devised many of Bhutan’s customs, traditions and
ceremonies in a deliberate effort to develop a unique cultural identity for the
country.
As
a revered Buddhist scholar, Zhabdrung had both the astuteness and authority to
codify the Kagyu religious teachings into a system that was distinctively
Bhutanese. He also defined the national dress and instituted the Tshechu
festival.
The
Zhabdrung created a code of laws that defined the relationship between the lay
people and the monastic community. A system of taxes was developed; these were
paid in kind in the form of wheat, buckwheat, rice, yak meat, butter, paper,
timber and clothing. The people were subject to a system of compulsory labour
for the construction of trails, dzongs, temples and bridges. These practices
lasted almost unchanged until the third king eliminated them in 1956.
In 1640’s Zhabdrung completed creation of Choesid Nyiden with
Desi as temporal ruler and Jekhenpo as spiritual abbot. He appointed Umze Tenzin
Drugay as first Desi (1591-1656) and Pekar Jungney as first Je Khenpo. To unify
eastern Bhutan, he appointed Chogyal Minjur Tenpa as first Trongsa Penlop who
later became third Desi of Bhutan.After unifying and giving identity to people,
Zhabdrung went into permanent retreat in 1651 and he was believed to have died
soon after.
The news of demise of Great Zhabdrung was kept secret for fear
of Tibetan Invasion and internal strife. His Death was only announced in 1705.
The four successive Desis, Umze Tenzin Drugay, La Ngoenpa Tenzin Drugdra ,
Chogyal Minjur Tenpa and GyalseTenzin Rabgay all felt that continued presence
of Zhabdrung was necessary to keep
country unified and Tibetans at bay though Tibetan mounted seven attacks on Bhutan between 1656 and 1730.
When the Je Khenpo finally announced the death of the Zhabdrung
in 1705, he said that three rays of light emanated from the Zhabdrung’s body,
representing the ku sung thug (body, speech and mind) of Ngawang
Namgyal. This indicated that the Zhabdrung would be reincarnated in these three
forms, though only the reincarnation of the Zhabdrung’s mind was considered to
be the head of state. Because the position of Zhabdrung was a continuing
one, it was necessary for the mind incarnation to be reborn after the death of
the previous incarnation.
This structure
resulted in long periods when the Zhabdrung was too young to rule and the Desi
often became the de facto ruler. Because the Desi was a semi- elected
position, there was considerable rivalry among various factions for the office.
These factions also took advantage of uncertainty over which of the three
incarnations of the Zhabdrung was the ‘true’ incarnation. None of the
successive incarnations had the personal charisma or political astuteness of
Ngawang Namgyal.
There were instances where mind and speech incarnations were
given the opportunities. Besides Zhabdrung incarnations, incarnations of
Zhabdrung’s son Jampel Dorji and incarnations of Zhabdrung’s heart son 4th
Desi Tenzin Rabgay were enthroned to fill the void.
The next 200 years were a time of civil war, internal conflicts
and political infighting. While there were only six mind incarnations of the
Zhabdrung during this period, there were 55 Desis. The
longest-serving Desi was the 13t hDesi, Sherab Wangchuk, who ruled
for 20 years; and the most important was the fourth, Gyalse Tenzin Rabgye, who
ruled from 1680 to 1694. Few of the rulers finished their term; 22 desis were
assassinated or deposed by rivals. Some even ruled for less than three months. Sometimes
two Desis ruled at a time.
The political situation became so unstable that some of the
rival factions appealed to the Tibetans for assistance. In 1729 and 1730 Tibet took advantage of Bhutan’s
instability and invaded the country three times. The lamas in Tibet initiated a truce that
eventually ended the hostilities. The rival Bhutanese factions submitted their
case to the Chinese emperor in Beijing for mediation. But the issue was
only finally resolved when several of the Bhutanese protagonists died, leaving
the then recognized mind incarnation of the Zhabdrung, Jigme Norbu as the ruler
or Gyaltshab/ Representative to throne. At the same time, formal diplomatic
relations were established between Bhutan and Tibet, which the late historian Michael
Aris said ‘helped to guarantee the fact of Bhutanese independence’.
Some Desis also meddled with affairs of other countries. For
instance in 1730 the 10th desi assisted Gya Chila formed alliance
with the Panchen Lama in Tibet and with Bhutan’s help King
Prithvi Narayan Shah of Nepal
was able to help ruler of Cooch Bihar to defeat invader and settle
family feud. Bhutanese force was then allowed to garrison in southern country.
However in 1772, Bhutanese invaded Cooch Bihar which prompted ruler to ask help
from British India. Thus the first contact between British India and Bhutan
began which let to many battles later. In his book, Lands of the
Thunderbolt, the Earl of Ronaldshay wrote:
…it
was not until 1772 that the East India Company became conscious of the
existence, across its northern frontier, of a meddlesome neighbour.
The British pushed the Bhutanese back into the hills and
followed them into Bhutan. The British won another major battle in January 1773
at the garrison of Chichacotta (now Khithokha) in the hills east of what is
now Phuentsholing. A second
battle was fought near Kalimpong in April 1773. The
Bhutanese troops were personally led by the 16th desi Sonam Lhendup alias
Zhidar but, after the second defeat, he was deposed by a coup d’état.
Bhutanese with help Penchemn lama signed treaty of Calcutta on 25 April 1774 agreeing to respect
territory of East India Company and allow cutting timber from Bhutanese soil.
By 1773, Cooch Bihar was completely under East India Company.
East
India Company was interested in trade route to Tibet via Bhutan and many
missions followed.
Meanwhile
the political intrigue and civil wars continued in Bhutan, and there were
numerous skirmishes over boundaries and trading rights. The British were
engaged in the Burmese war of 1825–26. As a result of this war, the British
gained control of Assam, the territory that forms the eastern half of
Bhutan’s southern border.
The
area of plains between the Brahmaputra River up to and including the lowest of
the hills of Bhutan was known as the duars, which means doors or
gates. The western part of this area, known as the Bengal Duars, had been
annexed by the third desi, Mingyur Tenpa, in the late 17th century and the
Bhutanese considered it their territory. The eastern part, the Assam Duars, had long been administered in a complex
rental agreement between Bhutan and Assam.
After
the Burmese war, the British took over the peculiar land rental arrangement for
the Assam Duars, along with what were described as ‘very
unsatisfactory relations of the Assamese with the Bhutanese’. Major
disagreements between Britain and Bhutan resulted. In 1826 the British and
Bhutanese came into conflict over the ownership of the duars. Other than
the area’s strategic importance, the British were attracted to
theduars because they were excellent tea-growing country. However, they
were also a malarial jungle, and the British had a very difficult time keeping
their troops healthy.
Bhutan’s
existing agreement with the Assamese allowed the British to occupy the region
from July to November, and the Bhutanese to occupy it the remainder of the year
in return for payment in horses, gold, knives, blankets, musk and other
articles. The new arrangement meant that Bhutan sent the payment to the
British, who accused the Bhutanese of delivering piebald horses and other
defective goods. The Bhutanese insisted that middlemen working for the British
had substituted inferior goods.
Disagreements
over payments and administration escalated. In 1836 the British mounted an
attack on Dewangiri (now Deothang), in the east, to force the surrender of
fugitives who had committed crimes in British territory.
The dzongpen refused to comply and attacked the British detachment.
The British won that battle and annexed Dewangiri and the entire Banska Duar.
The following year, however, at the request of the desi, they agreed
to return control of the duar to the Bhutanese.
The
British annexed the two easternmost duars in 1840 and the rest of
the Assam Duars in September 1841, agreeing to pay Bhutan an
annual compensation of Rs10, 000. Lord Auckland wrote to
the deb and dharma rajas that the British were:
…compelled
by an imperative sense of duty to occupy the whole of the duars without any
reference to your Highnesses’ wishes, as I feel assured that it is the only
course which is likely to hold out a prospect of restoring peace and prosperity
to that tract of country.
Perhaps
more revealing is a letter from Colonel Jenkins, the governor-general’s agent,
outlining the need for taking over the Assam Duars. He wrote:
‘had we
possession of the Dooars, the Bhootan Government would necessarily in a short
time become entirely dependent upon us, as holding in our hands the source of
all their subsistence’
This
was the time of the Afghan War and the Anglo–Sikh wars. The British Indian
administration had little time to worry about Bhutan, and major and minor
conflicts and cross-border incursions continued. Although the British were
making plans to annex the Bengal Duars, they were not able to follow through.
Their troops were kept busy trying to suppress the Indian uprising of 1857,
which was a movement against British rule in India.
Bhutan took
advantage of the instability in the region and mounted numerous raids in the
Bengal Duars. To compensate for their losses, the British deducted large sums
from payments they owed the Bhutanese. In 1861 the Bhutanese retaliated by
raiding Cooch Behar, capturing a number of elephants and kidnapping several
residents, including some British subjects.
In such
time of chaos and strife a man was born in Bumthang who would later helped
rewrite the history of Bhutan and who led some of above mentioned raids against
British India to ensure independence of Bhutan.
@mongaralumini@yahoo.com
No Thanks
ReplyDelete